In both cases the focus of the proposals do not really lie in the spatial quality of the pavilion, but, for this course, more in the structural beauty of a built object. The result will not be a fully designed pavilion. But rather a structural object testing if my hypothesis is correct. Stating that:
1) the in approximitely 600 milion years evoluated natural forms/structures are enough to achieve pure beauty in an architectural context.
2) these by nature evoluated structures are able, after adjusting them with respect to other force impacts, to function with the same level of efficiency in architectural circumstances.
Proposal One - focus: STRUCTURAL SKIN
- magnify the rad. web structure so that it would be big enough to become a pavilion.
- add additional support elements in order to keep the pavilion standing. (inspire the shape on other rad. skeleton types)
- Fix these additional support element(s) as a boundary condition.
- try optimizing the rad. tesselation in order to achieve a structural skin (gc diana loop)
- the topology of the structural skin would be the input from the radiolarian side of research, while the additional support would be one of the architectural inputs.
Proposal Two - focus: MAIN LOAD BEARING STRUCTURE
- build the main structure based on rad. in gc
- test loop with diana to adjust the structure for building environment
- then add the tesselation. and optimize on the field of: using the least amount of material.
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Intention Midterm presentation
I'm planning to give my midterm presentation for next monday the following contents:
- Hypothesis - research questions - testing
- Input & output of research
- Architectural input
- Radiolarian input
- G.C. sketch
- Plan for the next weeks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)